Weed-Infused Seltzer Lawsuit Bubbles to the Surface

kalo sodo with fruit around it
Read Time:2 Minute, 26 Second

A lawsuit filed by co-founder Kenneth Voorhees has alleged that Ken VandeVrede, former executive of Kaló, misappropriated corporate assets and stole the company’s name and branding for personal gain, benefiting Hillview Med. The lawsuit sheds light on the accusations of wrongdoing, raising concerns about corporate integrity and intellectual property rights.

What’s Weed-Infused Seltzer?

Weed-infused seltzer, also known as cannabis-infused seltzer or THC-infused seltzer, is a refreshing and increasingly popular beverage option that combines the effervescence of seltzer water with the psychoactive properties of cannabis. It offers an alternative method of cannabis consumption for individuals who prefer not to smoke or ingest traditional edibles.

To create weed-infused seltzer, the process typically involves infusing seltzer water with cannabis extracts or tinctures containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive compound found in cannabis. The THC is extracted from the cannabis plant and then carefully blended with the seltzer water to achieve the desired potency and flavor profile.

Misappropriation of Corporate Assets in the Kaló Case

In a lawsuit filed by co-founder Kenneth Voorhees, it is claimed that Ken VandeVrede, a former executive of Kaló, engaged in misconduct by misappropriating corporate assets and stealing the company’s name and branding. According to the lawsuit, VandeVrede allegedly used these assets to benefit New Jersey based company, Hillview Med, a competing entity in the same industry. The lawsuit seeks legal redress for the alleged wrongful actions and seeks to hold VandeVrede accountable for his purported actions.

The lawsuit alleges that VandeVrede misappropriated corporate assets belonging to Kaló. Misappropriation generally refers to the unauthorized use or misuse of assets owned by a company. In this case, the lawsuit claims that VandeVrede utilized these assets for personal gain, diverting them from their intended purpose and potentially harming the interests of Kaló and its stakeholders.

One of the key allegations in the lawsuit is the theft of Kaló’s name and branding by VandeVrede. Intellectual property, including brand names and trademarks, is a valuable asset for companies and is protected by law. If VandeVrede deliberately misappropriated Kaló’s name and branding for the benefit of another entity, it could potentially lead to confusion in the marketplace, reputational damage, and financial harm for Kaló.

If the allegations in the lawsuit are proven true, the consequences for VandeVrede could be significant.

If the allegations in the lawsuit are proven true, the consequences for VandeVrede could be significant. Legal remedies could include financial restitution to Kaló, potential damages awarded to the company, and potential legal penalties for intellectual property theft. Additionally, the lawsuit could impact VandeVrede’s professional reputation and credibility within the industry.

The allegations raised in this lawsuit underscore the significance of maintaining corporate integrity and adherence to ethical business practices. Ensuring proper use of corporate assets, respecting intellectual property rights, and acting in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders are fundamental principles for building trust and sustainability in the business world.

About Post Author


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *